Fresh variable

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

In formal reasoning, in particular in mathematical logic, computer algebra, and automated theorem proving, a fresh variable is a variable that did not occur in the context considered so far.[1][citation needed] The concept is often used without explanation.[2][citation needed]

Fresh variables may be used to replace other variables, to eliminate variable shadowing or capture. For instance, in alpha-conversion, the processing of terms in the lambda calculus into equivalent terms with renamed variables, replacing variables with fresh variables can be helpful as a way to avoid accidentally capturing variables that should be free.[3] Another use for fresh variables involves the development of loop invariants in formal program verification, where it is sometimes useful to replace constants by newly introduced fresh variables.[4]

Example

For example, in term rewriting, before applying a rule l r {\displaystyle l\to r} to a given term t {\displaystyle t} , each variable in l r {\displaystyle l\to r} should be replaced by a fresh one to avoid clashes with variables occurring in t {\displaystyle t} .[citation needed] Given the rule

a p p e n d ( c o n s ( x , y ) , z ) c o n s ( x , a p p e n d ( y , z ) ) {\displaystyle append(cons(x,y),z)\to cons(x,append(y,z))}

and the term

a p p e n d ( c o n s ( x , c o n s ( y , n i l ) ) , c o n s ( 3 , n i l ) ) {\displaystyle append(cons(x,cons(y,nil)),cons(3,nil))} ,

attempting to find a matching substitution of the rule's left-hand side, a p p e n d ( c o n s ( x , y ) , z ) {\displaystyle append(cons(x,y),z)} , within a p p e n d ( c o n s ( x , c o n s ( y , n i l ) ) , c o n s ( 3 , n i l ) ) {\displaystyle append(cons(x,cons(y,nil)),cons(3,nil))} will fail, since y {\displaystyle y} cannot match c o n s ( y , n i l ) {\displaystyle cons(y,nil)} . However, if the rule is replaced by a fresh copy[a]

a p p e n d ( c o n s ( v 1 , v 2 ) , v 3 ) c o n s ( v 1 , a p p e n d ( v 2 , v 3 ) ) {\displaystyle append(cons(v_{1},v_{2}),v_{3})\to cons(v_{1},append(v_{2},v_{3}))}

before, matching will succeed with the answer substitution { v 2 x , v 2 c o n s ( y , n i l ) , v 3 c o n s ( 3 , n i l ) } {\displaystyle \{v_{2}\mapsto x,\;v_{2}\mapsto cons(y,nil),\;v_{3}\mapsto cons(3,nil)\}} .

Notes

  1. ^ that is, a copy with each variable consistently replaced by a fresh variable

References

  1. ^ Carmen Bruni (2018). Predicate Logic: Natural Deduction (PDF) (Lecture Slides). Univ. of Waterloo. Here: slide 13/26.
  2. ^ Michael Färber (Feb 2023). Denotational Semantics and a Fast Interpreter for jq (Technical Report). Univ. of Innsbruck. arXiv:2302.10576. Here: p.4.
  3. ^ Gordon, Andrew D.; Melham, Thomas F. (1996). "Five axioms of alpha-conversion". In von Wright, Joakim; Grundy, Jim; Harrison, John (eds.). Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, 9th International Conference, TPHOLs'96, Turku, Finland, August 26-30, 1996, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 1125. Springer. pp. 173–190. doi:10.1007/BFB0105404.
  4. ^ Cohen, Edward (1990). "Loops B — On replacing constants by fresh variables". Programming in the 1990s. Monographs in Computer Science. New York: Springer. pp. 149–194. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9706-9. ISBN 9781461397069. S2CID 1509875.
  • v
  • t
  • e